ai city challenge
The 9th AI City Challenge
Tang, Zheng, Wang, Shuo, Anastasiu, David C., Chang, Ming-Ching, Sharma, Anuj, Kong, Quan, Kobori, Norimasa, Gochoo, Munkhjargal, Batnasan, Ganzorig, Otgonbold, Munkh-Erdene, Alnajjar, Fady, Hsieh, Jun-Wei, Kornuta, Tomasz, Li, Xiaolong, Zhao, Yilin, Zhang, Han, Radhakrishnan, Subhashree, Jain, Arihant, Kumar, Ratnesh, Murali, Vidya N., Wang, Yuxing, Pusegaonkar, Sameer Satish, Wang, Yizhou, Biswas, Sujit, Wu, Xunlei, Zheng, Zhedong, Chakraborty, Pranamesh, Chellappa, Rama
The ninth AI City Challenge continues to advance real-world applications of computer vision and AI in transportation, industrial automation, and public safety. The 2025 edition featured four tracks and saw a 17% increase in participation, with 245 teams from 15 countries registered on the evaluation server. Public release of challenge datasets led to over 30,000 downloads to date. Track 1 focused on multi-class 3D multi-camera tracking, involving people, humanoids, autonomous mobile robots, and forklifts, using detailed calibration and 3D bounding box annotations. Track 2 tackled video question answering in traffic safety, with multi-camera incident understanding enriched by 3D gaze labels. Track 3 addressed fine-grained spatial reasoning in dynamic warehouse environments, requiring AI systems to interpret RGB-D inputs and answer spatial questions that combine perception, geometry, and language. Both Track 1 and Track 3 datasets were generated in NVIDIA Omniverse. Track 4 emphasized efficient road object detection from fisheye cameras, supporting lightweight, real-time deployment on edge devices. The evaluation framework enforced submission limits and used a partially held-out test set to ensure fair benchmarking. Final rankings were revealed after the competition concluded, fostering reproducibility and mitigating overfitting. Several teams achieved top-tier results, setting new benchmarks in multiple tasks.
- Asia > Middle East > UAE (0.14)
- North America > United States > Hawaii > Honolulu County > Honolulu (0.08)
- Asia > Macao (0.04)
- (5 more...)
- Information Technology (0.36)
- Leisure & Entertainment (0.34)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Vision (1.00)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Machine Learning (1.00)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Natural Language > Large Language Model (0.94)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Representation & Reasoning > Object-Oriented Architecture (0.68)
The 8th AI City Challenge
Wang, Shuo, Anastasiu, David C., Tang, Zheng, Chang, Ming-Ching, Yao, Yue, Zheng, Liang, Rahman, Mohammed Shaiqur, Arya, Meenakshi S., Sharma, Anuj, Chakraborty, Pranamesh, Prajapati, Sanjita, Kong, Quan, Kobori, Norimasa, Gochoo, Munkhjargal, Otgonbold, Munkh-Erdene, Alnajjar, Fady, Batnasan, Ganzorig, Chen, Ping-Yang, Hsieh, Jun-Wei, Wu, Xunlei, Pusegaonkar, Sameer Satish, Wang, Yizhou, Biswas, Sujit, Chellappa, Rama
The eighth AI City Challenge highlighted the convergence of computer vision and artificial intelligence in areas like retail, warehouse settings, and Intelligent Traffic Systems (ITS), presenting significant research opportunities. The 2024 edition featured five tracks, attracting unprecedented interest from 726 teams in 47 countries and regions. Track 1 dealt with multi-target multi-camera (MTMC) people tracking, highlighting significant enhancements in camera count, character number, 3D annotation, and camera matrices, alongside new rules for 3D tracking and online tracking algorithm encouragement. Track 2 introduced dense video captioning for traffic safety, focusing on pedestrian accidents using multi-camera feeds to improve insights for insurance and prevention. Track 3 required teams to classify driver actions in a naturalistic driving analysis. Track 4 explored fish-eye camera analytics using the FishEye8K dataset. Track 5 focused on motorcycle helmet rule violation detection. The challenge utilized two leaderboards to showcase methods, with participants setting new benchmarks, some surpassing existing state-of-the-art achievements.
- Asia > Middle East > UAE (0.14)
- North America > United States > Washington > King County > Seattle (0.07)
- Asia > Taiwan (0.04)
- (10 more...)
A Global Smart-City Competition Highlights China's Rise In AI - AI Summary
Four years ago, organizers created the international AI City Challenge to spur the development of artificial intelligence for real-world scenarios like counting cars traveling through intersections or spotting accidents on freeways. Last week, Chinese tech giants Alibaba and Baidu swept the AI City Challenge, beating competitors from nearly 40 nations. Hundreds of Chinese cities have pilot programs, and by some estimates, China has half of the world's smart cities. One of the competitions in the AI City Challenge asked participants to identify cars in videofeeds; for the first time this year, the descriptions were in ordinary language, such as "a blue Jeep goes straight down a winding road behind a red pickup truck." He says AI researchers in the US can also compete for government grants like the National Science Foundation's Civic Innovation Challenge or the Department of Transportation's Smart City Challenge.
- Asia > China (1.00)
- North America > United States (0.67)
- Transportation > Ground > Road (0.67)
- Government > Regional Government (0.67)
- Automobiles & Trucks > Manufacturer (0.67)
A Global Smart-City Competition Highlights China's Rise in AI
Four years ago, organizers created the international AI City Challenge to spur the development of artificial intelligence for real-world scenarios like counting cars traveling through intersections or spotting accidents on freeways. In the first years, teams representing American companies or universities took top spots in the competition. Last year, Chinese companies won three out of four competitions. Last week, Chinese tech giants Alibaba and Baidu swept the AI City Challenge, beating competitors from nearly 40 nations. Chinese companies or universities took first and second place in all five categories.
- North America > United States > Ohio > Franklin County > Columbus (0.06)
- Asia > China > Zhejiang Province > Hangzhou (0.06)
- Government > Regional Government > North America Government > United States Government (1.00)
- Transportation (0.83)
Dual-Modality Vehicle Anomaly Detection via Bilateral Trajectory Tracing
Chen, Jingyuan, Ding, Guanchen, Yang, Yuchen, Han, Wenwei, Xu, Kangmin, Gao, Tianyi, Zhang, Zhe, Ouyang, Wanping, Cai, Hao, Chen, Zhenzhong
Traffic anomaly detection has played a crucial role in Intelligent Transportation System (ITS). The main challenges of this task lie in the highly diversified anomaly scenes and variational lighting conditions. Although much work has managed to identify the anomaly in homogenous weather and scene, few resolved to cope with complex ones. In this paper, we proposed a dual-modality modularized methodology for the robust detection of abnormal vehicles. We introduced an integrated anomaly detection framework comprising the following modules: background modeling, vehicle tracking with detection, mask construction, Region of Interest (ROI) backtracking, and dual-modality tracing. Concretely, we employed background modeling to filter the motion information and left the static information for later vehicle detection. For the vehicle detection and tracking module, we adopted YOLOv5 and multi-scale tracking to localize the anomalies. Besides, we utilized the frame difference and tracking results to identify the road and obtain the mask. In addition, we introduced multiple similarity estimation metrics to refine the anomaly period via backtracking. Finally, we proposed a dual-modality bilateral tracing module to refine the time further. The experiments conducted on the Track 4 testset of the NVIDIA 2021 AI City Challenge yielded a result of 0.9302 F1-Score and 3.4039 root mean square error (RMSE), indicating the effectiveness of our framework.
- North America > United States > Iowa (0.04)
- Asia > China > Hubei Province > Wuhan (0.04)
- Leisure & Entertainment > Sports (0.34)
- Transportation > Infrastructure & Services (0.34)
Vehicle Re-identification Method Based on Vehicle Attribute and Mutual Exclusion Between Cameras
Chen, Junru, Geng, Shiqing, Yan, Yongluan, Huang, Danyang, Liu, Hao, Li, Yadong
Vehicle Re-identification aims to identify a specific vehicle across time and camera view. With the rapid growth of intelligent transportation systems and smart cities, vehicle Re-identification technology gets more and more attention. However, due to the difference of shooting angle and the high similarity of vehicles belonging to the same brand, vehicle re-identification becomes a great challenge for existing method. In this paper, we propose a vehicle attribute-guided method to re-rank vehicle Re-ID result. The attributes used include vehicle orientation and vehicle brand . We also focus on the camera information and introduce camera mutual exclusion theory to further fine-tune the search results. In terms of feature extraction, we combine the data augmentations of multi-resolutions with the large model ensemble to get a more robust vehicle features. Our method achieves mAP of 63.73% and rank-1 accuracy 76.61% in the CVPR 2021 AI City Challenge.
The 5th AI City Challenge
Naphade, Milind, Wang, Shuo, Anastasiu, David C., Tang, Zheng, Chang, Ming-Ching, Yang, Xiaodong, Yao, Yue, Zheng, Liang, Chakraborty, Pranamesh, Sharma, Anuj, Feng, Qi, Ablavsky, Vitaly, Sclaroff, Stan
The AI City Challenge was created with two goals in mind: (1) pushing the boundaries of research and development in intelligent video analysis for smarter cities use cases, and (2) assessing tasks where the level of performance is enough to cause real-world adoption. Transportation is a segment ripe for such adoption. The fifth AI City Challenge attracted 305 participating teams across 38 countries, who leveraged city-scale real traffic data and high-quality synthetic data to compete in five challenge tracks. Track 1 addressed video-based automatic vehicle counting, where the evaluation being conducted on both algorithmic effectiveness and computational efficiency. Track 2 addressed city-scale vehicle re-identification with augmented synthetic data to substantially increase the training set for the task. Track 3 addressed city-scale multi-target multi-camera vehicle tracking. Track 4 addressed traffic anomaly detection. Track 5 was a new track addressing vehicle retrieval using natural language descriptions. The evaluation system shows a general leader board of all submitted results, and a public leader board of results limited to the contest participation rules, where teams are not allowed to use external data in their work. The public leader board shows results more close to real-world situations where annotated data is limited. Results show the promise of AI in Smarter Transportation. State-of-the-art performance for some tasks shows that these technologies are ready for adoption in real-world systems.
- North America > United States > Iowa (0.05)
- Oceania > Australia (0.04)
- North America > United States > California > Santa Clara County > Santa Clara (0.04)
- Asia > India > Uttar Pradesh > Kanpur (0.04)